RACI
Assigns who is responsible, accountable, consulted and informed for each decision or deliverable. Fixes genuine ambiguity, and becomes bureaucracy when applied to a team small enough to just talk to each other.
The printable canvas and the handoff into Claude Code are part of a paid plan. See what a plan includes. It needs the Claude desktop app on this machine, and your team and the prompt library already installed in that project — we cannot see your disk, so open it there.
What it is
A responsibility matrix assigning four roles to each decision or deliverable. Its value is almost entirely in the constraint that exactly one person is Accountable, which forces conversations organisations otherwise avoid.
- Responsible
- Who does the work. Can be several people.
- Accountable
- Who owns the outcome and makes the final call. Exactly one per row, always. This rule is the tool.
- Consulted
- Whose input is genuinely sought before the decision, in two-way dialogue. Should be short — every name costs time.
- Informed
- Who is told afterwards, one-way. Costs nothing and can be generous.
- The pathologies
- Rows with no Accountable, rows with two, individuals Consulted on everything, and people doing the work who appear nowhere on the grid.
How you run it
- List decisions and deliverables, not activities"Approve pricing changes" is a decision. "Marketing" is a department. Only the former can be assigned.
- Enforce exactly one Accountable per rowThis is the entire value of the tool. Two names means nobody, and rows where people fight over the A are precisely the ones causing your delays.
- Keep Consulted shortEveryone wants to be consulted and every consultation costs time. Consulted means their input changes the outcome, not that they would like to know.
- Look for the pathologiesRows with no A, rows with several, people who are C on everything, and people who appear nowhere but do the work.
- Publish it and use itA RACI agreed in a workshop and filed changes nothing. It only works when someone points at it during the next disagreement.
The prompt
Run this tool in your own Claude
The short prompt starts your partner against the library on your disk. The long one carries everything with it and needs nothing installed.
Your playbook
It lands in the earliest stage this tool suits. Move it on the Playbook page.
You’ll need
- A list of the actual decisions and deliverables in dispute
- The people involved, in the room
- Someone able to settle a disagreement about accountability
You’ll end up with
- A grid with one A per row
- Ambiguities surfaced and resolved
- A short list of decisions still contested