Customer · Explore, Choose

Willingness to pay

Establishes what a customer would actually pay, rather than what competitors currently charge. Benchmarking tells you where the market settled; this tells you whether it settled in the right place.

The printable canvas and the handoff into Claude Code are part of a paid plan. See what a plan includes. It needs the Claude desktop app on this machine, and your team and the prompt library already installed in that project — we cannot see your disk, so open it there.

Stage
02 Explore, 03 Choose
Works at
Business, Department
Maturity
Any
Time
One to two weeks including fieldwork

What it is

Direct measurement of what a defined segment will pay for a defined offer, taken from buyers rather than from competitors' price lists. Techniques run from the four Van Westendorp price sensitivity questions through choice-based methods to controlled tests on live traffic — all of them answering what the customer would do, which no benchmark can.

The defined offer
Exactly what is being priced, including what is excluded. Vague offers get priced as whatever the respondent already knows, which is not the thing you sell.
The segment
Willingness to pay varies more between segments than between competitors. One blended number is usually the average of two real answers and matches neither of them.
The reference alternative
What the customer would do instead, including nothing at all. Price is judged against that alternative rather than against your costs.
The four price questions
Too cheap, cheap, expensive, too expensive. Where those curves cross bounds a range — and the "too cheap" answer, the one people leave out, is what catches quality signalling.
Stated against revealed
What people say they would pay sits reliably above what they do pay. Use stated methods to find the range and a live test to find the number.
Feature separability
Which parts customers will pay for on their own. This decides packaging, and it is frequently worth more than the headline price.
The mistake people makeAsking "what would you pay for this?" as a single open question. It produces a number that is polite, unanchored and useless, and it is the version of this research most businesses have already done once.
What it’s forYou are setting or resetting a price and the only evidence is what everybody else charges.
What it’s not forThe offer is still changing. Price research on a moving product measures nothing twice.

How you run it

  1. Define the offer tightly, including exclusionsRespondents price what they picture. An underspecified offer is priced as the nearest thing they have already bought.
  2. Segment before you askRun the work separately per segment. A blended willingness to pay is the average of genuinely different answers and will match nobody.
  3. Anchor against the real alternativeIncluding doing nothing, which is the most common competitor. Price is always judged relative to the option the customer would otherwise take.
  4. Use the four-question frame, not one open questionToo cheap, cheap, expensive, too expensive. The crossings give a defensible range, and the "too cheap" curve finds where a low price reads as a poor product.
  5. Confirm the number with a live testStated intent sets the range; a controlled test on real traffic or a real quote sets the price. Never ship a price that only survey respondents have agreed to.

The prompt

Two ways to run it

Run this tool in your own Claude

The short prompt starts your partner against the library on your disk. The long one carries everything with it and needs nothing installed.

🔒 Prompt locked

Everything above is free — what this tool is, what it is for, what it is not for, and how to run it as a workshop. Three tool prompts a month are free with an account; beyond three, and for the printable canvas, it is the paid part.

See plans — from £19 a month