Risk · Choose

Red team review

Someone is formally tasked with destroying the proposal. Different from a pre-mortem: this is adversarial rather than imaginative, and it needs a mandate to work.

The printable canvas and the handoff into Claude Code are part of a paid plan. See what a plan includes. It needs the Claude desktop app on this machine, and your team and the prompt library already installed in that project — we cannot see your disk, so open it there.

Stage
03 Choose
Works at
Corporate, Business
Maturity
Scaling → Large organisation
Time
A week for the team to prepare, half a day to present

What it is

A formally mandated adversarial review, in which a named group is tasked with building the strongest possible case against a proposal. Distinct from a pre-mortem in being adversarial rather than imaginative, and in requiring authority to be effective.

The mandate
Explicit, written authority to attack the proposal, with protection from consequences. The single most important element and the one most often missing.
The team
People with enough standing that their objections cannot be waved away, and enough independence to want to.
Preparation
Access to the full proposal and real time to work. A red team assembled on the day produces reactions, not analysis.
The case against
The strongest available argument that this fails — evidenced, specific, and ideally paired with what they would do instead.
The response
Each objection formally accepted, mitigated or rejected with reasoning, in writing. This is what distinguishes the exercise from theatre.
The mistake people makeDo not run this on a fractured team. Formal opposition in an organisation already split hardens positions and turns a analytical exercise into a proxy for an existing fight.
What it’s forThe room agrees too easily and you want the case against, argued properly.
What it’s not forThe team is already fractured. Formal opposition will harden positions.

How you run it

  1. Give the red team a real mandateWritten, from the decision-maker, protecting them from consequences. Without it you get polite questions and everyone's time wasted.
  2. Choose people with standingJunior or peripheral people cannot red team a leadership proposal, however good their arguments. Credibility is what makes the objections land.
  3. Give them the material and timeA red team briefed the morning of the session produces impressions. Give them the pack and a week.
  4. Require a constructive case, not just attackThe strongest form is "here is why this fails, and here is what we would do instead". Pure demolition is easy and gets dismissed.
  5. Respond in writingEach objection accepted, mitigated or rejected with a reason. An unanswered red team review teaches the organisation the exercise is theatre.

The prompt

Two ways to run it

Run this tool in your own Claude

The short prompt starts your partner against the library on your disk. The long one carries everything with it and needs nothing installed.

🔒 Prompt locked

Everything above is free — what this tool is, what it is for, what it is not for, and how to run it as a workshop. Three tool prompts a month are free with an account; beyond three, and for the printable canvas, it is the paid part.

See plans — from £19 a month