Red team review
Someone is formally tasked with destroying the proposal. Different from a pre-mortem: this is adversarial rather than imaginative, and it needs a mandate to work.
The printable canvas and the handoff into Claude Code are part of a paid plan. See what a plan includes. It needs the Claude desktop app on this machine, and your team and the prompt library already installed in that project — we cannot see your disk, so open it there.
What it is
A formally mandated adversarial review, in which a named group is tasked with building the strongest possible case against a proposal. Distinct from a pre-mortem in being adversarial rather than imaginative, and in requiring authority to be effective.
- The mandate
- Explicit, written authority to attack the proposal, with protection from consequences. The single most important element and the one most often missing.
- The team
- People with enough standing that their objections cannot be waved away, and enough independence to want to.
- Preparation
- Access to the full proposal and real time to work. A red team assembled on the day produces reactions, not analysis.
- The case against
- The strongest available argument that this fails — evidenced, specific, and ideally paired with what they would do instead.
- The response
- Each objection formally accepted, mitigated or rejected with reasoning, in writing. This is what distinguishes the exercise from theatre.
How you run it
- Give the red team a real mandateWritten, from the decision-maker, protecting them from consequences. Without it you get polite questions and everyone's time wasted.
- Choose people with standingJunior or peripheral people cannot red team a leadership proposal, however good their arguments. Credibility is what makes the objections land.
- Give them the material and timeA red team briefed the morning of the session produces impressions. Give them the pack and a week.
- Require a constructive case, not just attackThe strongest form is "here is why this fails, and here is what we would do instead". Pure demolition is easy and gets dismissed.
- Respond in writingEach objection accepted, mitigated or rejected with a reason. An unanswered red team review teaches the organisation the exercise is theatre.
The prompt
Run this tool in your own Claude
The short prompt starts your partner against the library on your disk. The long one carries everything with it and needs nothing installed.
Your playbook
It lands in the earliest stage this tool suits. Move it on the Playbook page.
You’ll need
- A written proposal the red team can attack
- People credible enough that their objections carry
- An explicit mandate and protection for them
You’ll end up with
- The strongest case against, argued properly
- The assumptions that did not survive
- A decision on what changes