Pricing benchmark
Establishes where your prices actually sit against the alternatives a customer is choosing between. Harder than it sounds, because published prices and paid prices are different numbers.
The printable canvas and the handoff into Claude Code are part of a paid plan. See what a plan includes. It needs the Claude desktop app on this machine, and your team and the prompt library already installed in that project — we cannot see your disk, so open it there.
What it is
A comparison of your prices against the realistic alternatives a customer is choosing between, normalised so the comparison is meaningful. Complicated by the fact that published prices are rarely what anybody pays.
- Comparison basis
- The normalised unit — per item, per user, per month, per outcome — with inclusions and terms equalised. Most of the work sits here.
- Your realised price
- What you actually receive after discount and rebate, and its distribution across customers.
- Competitor realised prices
- What competitors actually charge, gathered from lost deals, tenders and customer conversations rather than from published rate cards.
- The consideration set
- What the customer genuinely compares, including substitutes and inaction. Benchmarking outside this set is irrelevant precision.
- Explanation of gaps
- What a higher price includes and whether customers value it. Turns a comparison into a finding.
- Position decision
- Match, hold and justify, or diverge deliberately. Drift is what happens without this.
How you run it
- Define like-for-like carefullyDifferent inclusions, terms and volumes make headline prices meaningless. Normalise to a comparable unit before comparing anything.
- Find realised prices, not list pricesPublished pricing is an opening position in most markets. Lost deals, tender results, procurement contacts and customer conversations are better sources.
- Compare against what customers actually considerIncluding substitutes and doing nothing. Benchmarking against competitors your customers do not shortlist is precise and irrelevant.
- Explain the differencesA price gap without an explanation is a number. Work out what the higher-priced option includes and whether customers value it.
- Decide what to do about the gapMatch, hold and justify, or move further away deliberately. All three are legitimate; drifting toward the middle without deciding is not.
The prompt
Run this tool in your own Claude
The short prompt starts your partner against the library on your disk. The long one carries everything with it and needs nothing installed.
Your playbook
It lands in the earliest stage this tool suits. Move it on the Playbook page.
You’ll need
- Your own realised prices, not list
- A defensible set of alternatives from the customer's view
- Some way to see what competitors actually charge
You’ll end up with
- Comparable prices for like-for-like offers
- Where you sit, with the comparison basis stated
- What the price differences buy the customer