Risk · Choose, Plan

Pre-mortem

Imagining a failure that has already happened unlocks objections that "what could go wrong?" never surfaces. The framing does the work.

The printable canvas and the handoff into Claude Code are part of a paid plan. See what a plan includes. It needs the Claude desktop app on this machine, and your team and the prompt library already installed in that project — we cannot see your disk, so open it there.

Stage
03 Choose, 04 Plan
Works at
All levels
Maturity
Any
Time
45 minutes

What it is

Gary Klein's technique: before committing to a decision, assume it has already failed, and explain why. The tense is the whole mechanism. Asking "what could go wrong?" invites hedged, socially safe answers; asking people to account for a failure that has definitively happened gives them permission to say the thing they would otherwise keep to themselves.

The premise
Stated as history, not prediction. "It is three years from now. This failed badly." Not "might fail" — did fail. Certainty is what unlocks the honesty.
Silent generation
Everyone writes their own account before anyone speaks. Without this the first voice anchors the room and you surface one failure mode instead of eight.
Collection without debate
All accounts read out, none argued with. Arguing about plausibility is precisely the reflex the exercise exists to suspend.
Ranking
Only now do you judge: each failure mode weighed for likelihood and for damage. You are hunting the two or three that are both.
Warning signs and changes
For each top failure, what you would have observed in year one — and what you change in the plan today. A pre-mortem that ends in a list has done half its job.
The mistake people makeIt must run before the decision is announced. Once a course is public, the same exercise becomes a blame rehearsal and people revert to saying what is safe.
What it’s forA decision is nearly made and you want the objections while they are still cheap.
What it’s not forThe decision is already announced. This becomes a blame rehearsal rather than a test.

How you run it

  1. Set the scene in the past tense"It is three years from now. This failed badly." Not "might fail" — did fail. The certainty is what frees people to speak.
  2. Write silently firstEveryone writes their own account before anyone speaks, or the first voice anchors the room and you get one failure mode instead of eight.
  3. Read them out without debateCollect all of them. Arguing about plausibility is exactly the reflex the exercise exists to suspend.
  4. Rank by plausibility times damageNow you can judge. You want the two or three that are both likely and severe.
  5. Convert to warning signs and changesWhat would we have seen in year one, and what do we change today? A pre-mortem that ends in a list has done half its job.

The prompt

Two ways to run it

Run this tool in your own Claude

The short prompt starts your partner against the library on your disk. The long one carries everything with it and needs nothing installed.

🔒 Prompt locked

Everything above is free — what this tool is, what it is for, what it is not for, and how to run it as a workshop. Three tool prompts a month are free with an account; beyond three, and for the printable canvas, it is the paid part.

See plans — from £19 a month